Jump to content


Welcome to iElmira

Welcome to iElmira, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In. You can even login in painlessly with your facebook or twitter account!
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Add events to our community calendar
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
Special note to guests: We do have a completely anonymous section called iElmira Hot-Tips, where you can post your HotTip for the rest of the community, without anyone knowing who you are. Hey! Go use it now!
Oh go ahead and register, I want you to.
Photo

Harvard study: Pasteurized milk from industrial dairies linked to cancer


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 ONLINE   Bill

Bill

    Curator

  • Administrators
    • Member ID: 1
  • 82,650 posts
  • LocationPine City, NY

Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:42 AM

Natural News

The truth has once again shaken the foundation of the 'American Tower of Babel' that is mainstream science, with a new study out of Harvard University showing that pasteurized milk product from factory farms is linked to causing hormone-dependent cancers. It turns out that the concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) model of raising cows on factory farms churns out milk with dangerously high levels of estrone sulfate, an estrogen compound linked to testicular, prostate, and breast cancers.

At least it won't kill you like raw milk.

#2 OFFLINE   ephantmon

ephantmon

    Amazing iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 1,012
  • 1,913 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 12:42 PM

The title of the article is a bit of a red herring as pasteurization has nothing to do with the hormone levels that are (apparently) linked to cancers. As the article clearly states, the issues are the timing and duration of milking, not raw vs. pasteurized.

#3 OFFLINE   watchdog2020

watchdog2020

    Dedicated iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 792
  • 1,230 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:00 PM

The title of the article is a bit of a red herring as pasteurization has nothing to do with the hormone levels that are (apparently) linked to cancers. As the article clearly states, the issues are the timing and duration of milking, not raw vs. pasteurized.

And it's causing 14 year old girls to be built like they're 20

#4 OFFLINE   ephantmon

ephantmon

    Amazing iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 1,012
  • 1,913 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:03 PM

And it's causing 14 year old girls to be built like they're 20

I can't tell if there's sarcasm here or not. If you're serious, any supporting data would be great.

#5 OFFLINE   watchdog2020

watchdog2020

    Dedicated iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 792
  • 1,230 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:14 PM

I can't tell if there's sarcasm here or not. If you're serious, any supporting data would be great.

some sarcasm but there are a ton of articles on the net if you search for them. Here is just one linking the two.http://frugivoremag....lk-consumption/

#6 OFFLINE   ephantmon

ephantmon

    Amazing iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 1,012
  • 1,913 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:24 PM

some sarcasm but there are a ton of articles on the net if you search for them. Here is just one linking the two.http://frugivoremag....lk-consumption/

I was referring more to actual studies, not anecdotes. I'm familiar with the myriad of websites dedicated to the organic movement, anti-GMO movement, general "green" movement, and most are clearly either personal blogs or trying to sell something. Given that the only places I've found this particular article linked are conspiracy theory websites, anti-government websites, and pro-organic websites, I'll take it with a grain of salt. At least until I can read the actual study.

#7 OFFLINE   watchdog2020

watchdog2020

    Dedicated iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 792
  • 1,230 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:39 PM

Personal observation doesn’t count as scientific data but there is defiantly a hormonal advancement that wasn’t there 20+ years ago. Or, maybe I’m turning into a dirty old man

#8 OFFLINE   ephantmon

ephantmon

    Amazing iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 1,012
  • 1,913 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:31 PM

Personal observation doesn’t count as scientific data but there is defiantly a hormonal advancement that wasn’t there 20+ years ago. Or, maybe I’m turning into a dirty old man

There definitely HAS been a decrease in average age of puberty in the last 100 years. Most research implicates a combination of better nutrition and better healthcare. rBST didn't hit the market in the US or Europe until the mid 1990's, and this trend certainly pre-dates that. There has also been a trend socially of more revealing clothes and a more casual attitude towards sex. Clothing not normally seen on people until their 20's is showing up on kids in their early teens, possibly making them seem older. After all, what kind of 12 year old wears fishnets and heels?

#9 ONLINE   Bill

Bill

    Curator

  • Administrators
    • Member ID: 1
  • 82,650 posts
  • LocationPine City, NY

Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:36 PM

I was referring more to actual studies, not anecdotes. I'm familiar with the myriad of websites dedicated to the organic movement, anti-GMO movement, general "green" movement, and most are clearly either personal blogs or trying to sell something. Given that the only places I've found this particular article linked are conspiracy theory websites, anti-government websites, and pro-organic websites, I'll take it with a grain of salt. At least until I can read the actual study.

I hear you, and I too like actual studies for my data.My personal anecdote is Puerto Rico. 25 years ago, a few of the large hormone producers set up shop, as the manufacturing is very cheap there, no taxes, no oversight of regulatory agencies. WIthin a coupe of years, the girls around the factories, some as young as 8 or 9 started early development. There has been two entire generations of females now that started menses at 9 and developed bodies of full grown women before they were 12. Anecdotal. For sure.

#10 OFFLINE   99Savage

99Savage

    Dedicated iElmiran

  • UberMember
    • Member ID: 437
  • 1,286 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:51 PM

EVERYTHING "Causes Cancer" - but oddly the rates keep falling
Do something, if you do it wrong you can do it over but you will never get back time you wasted deciding what to do.

#11 ONLINE   Bill

Bill

    Curator

  • Administrators
    • Member ID: 1
  • 82,650 posts
  • LocationPine City, NY

Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:51 PM

Every single one of us are going to die from something. 100% fatality.

#12 OFFLINE   Bazinga

Bazinga

    Not Here To Be Liked

  • Members
  • Pip
    • Member ID: 1,251
  • 0 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:45 PM

That is interesting on the rates keep falling, I guess with more technology they can find more causes they otherwise wouldn't.
July 12th 2012: The day it was determined the almighty Joe Pa and his precious PSU Football program was the biggest and most disgusting fraud of all time!

All Paterno Apologists who kept chirping over the years that he was the greatest of all time and ran the cleanest program of all the power confrences can suck it.

#13 ONLINE   Bill

Bill

    Curator

  • Administrators
    • Member ID: 1
  • 82,650 posts
  • LocationPine City, NY

Posted 27 February 2012 - 04:34 PM

Death is a terminal disease. There is no escaping it.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users